Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

Brilliant AchievementBrilliant Achievement

Editor's Pick

Kennedy Says Cut Subsidies for Farmers and Junk Food

Chris Edwards

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. writes in the Wall Street Journal that “Trump Can Make America Healthy Again.” I agree with Kennedy that some national health trends are disturbing. The share of US adults who are obese has risen from 15 percent in the late 1970s to 42 percent today.

Kennedy proposes some health system changes that I am not qualified to assess. But I approve of his proposals for food stamps and farm subsidies quoted here.

Stop allowing beneficiaries of the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program to use their food stamps to buy soda or processed foods. Nine percent of all SNAP funding goes to sweetened drinks, according to 2011 data. It’s nonsensical for U.S. taxpayers to spend tens of billions of dollars subsidizing junk that harms the health of low-income Americans.

SNAP will cost taxpayers $105 billion this year, with almost 25 percent of the dollars going toward junk food, including soda, candy, potato chips, cookies, and ice cream. Those subsidies are absurd given the explosion in obesity and the government’s large budget deficits.

Low-income individuals have higher obesity rates than other Americans, and SNAP recipients have higher obesity rates than low-income individuals not on the program. The “N” in SNAP is a government falsehood.

The best reform would be to repeal SNAP and allow the states to pursue their own low-income food policies. But regarding Kennedy’s proposal, I’d suggest simply giving the states waivers allowing them to cut out any foods they want from their SNAP programs. The federal government has denied such waivers in the past.

Reform crop subsidies. They make corn, soybeans and wheat artificially cheap, so those crops end up in many processed forms. Soybean oil in the 1990s became a major source of American calories, and high-fructose corn syrup is everywhere. Our subsidy program is so backward that less than 2% of farm subsidies go to fruits and vegetables.

Crop subsidies should be repealed because they burden taxpayers and distort agriculture. Kennedy is right that fruits and vegetables receive few subsidies, and neither does ranching. But the lesson is not that subsidies for crops should be reallocated to other products, but that most American farming prospers without subsidies. There is no reason to coddle corn, wheat, and soybean farmers when other farmers stand proudly on their own two feet.

More on SNAP here.

More on farm subsidies here.

Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get Premium Articles For Free
Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

You May Also Like

Editor's Pick

Gene Healy I have no end of uncharitable thoughts about recent American presidents; yet, when I’m cataloging their sins, the words “undue caution” have...

Editor's Pick

Travis Fisher It’s no secret that administrative agencies have significantly overstepped their statutory authority in recent decades. The Supreme Court’s recent Loper Bright ruling—marking...

Editor's Pick

Walter Olson Here’s a roundup of election law and policy items I wish there were time to do as single posts: Confirming the intuitive:...

Editor's Pick

Walter Olson With apologies to Shakespeare, nothing in his term became him like the leaving it. Even those of us who regularly disagree with...