Politics
Molinari argues that majority rule is no more legitimate than royal absolutism when it violates individual rights.
Hi, what are you looking for?
Murray Rothbard famously asked Cui bono? to help unearth government scandals. Kenya’s politicians certainly benefitted from the Eurobond affair.
Ludwig von Mises had many insights about immigration. As one might expect, he foresaw problems with open borders, but also believed immigration could benefit...
Record-low consumer confidence and record-strong corporate earnings aren’t a paradox: they’re the Cantillon effect in real time. Mark Thornton explains who inflation rewards, who...
Molinari argues that majority rule is no more legitimate than royal absolutism when it violates individual rights.
Molinari distinguishes between society, which arises naturally from voluntary human cooperation, and government, which imposes itself through force.
Molinari describes how coercive control over defense led to the familiar abuses of taxation, war, and the suppression of individual liberty.
Molinari draws a parallel between monopoly and communism, arguing that both represent departures from the principle of free competition.
Molinari frames this choice as the central political question that determines whether a society will be free or oppressed.