Politics
The US regime can entice “cooperation” from tech companies with enough taxpayer money and threats of regulation.
Hi, what are you looking for?
Antitrust populists claimed blocking the Spirit–JetBlue merger would protect competition and consumers. But their effort led to an intervention that strengthened the very oligopoly...
If executed perfectly, this swap allows the Fed to neutralize a shrinking money supply by swapping $2 trillion in mortgages for $2 trillion in...
Philosopher Matt Zwolinski has declared libertarianism to lack any coherent standards. Zwolinski’s confusion is the result of his rejection of libertarianism as outlined by...
The government created a market for stolen goods, paid criminals cash for five months, watched robberies spike, arrested everyone at a mafia-themed party.
The US regime can entice “cooperation” from tech companies with enough taxpayer money and threats of regulation.
Once reserved to actual American servicemen, Republicans now seek taxpayer funded benefits for Americans who fight for Israel.
The UK does not have an energy problem, it has a freedom problem.
The Trump administration’s downsizing USAID has brought the usual claims: that without US aid, millions of poor people around the world will die of...
The dearth of child-bearing in western countries like the US is seen as a political crisis. Yet, if there is any place in our...
The old republic is gone. The constitutional order of the Jeffersonian years—i.e., the so-called “American experiment”—was swept away long ago.
The Trump administration’s downsizing USAID has brought the usual claims: that without US aid, millions of poor people around the world will die of...
In his concluding argument, Molinari envisions a society where security is provided by competing private firms chosen voluntarily by consumers.
Molinari describes the inevitable consequences of monopolized security: rising costs, declining quality, and the use of force against the very citizens the government claims...
Molinari argues that majority rule is no more legitimate than royal absolutism when it violates individual rights.